Click here to join our monthly mailing list. Just send a message with subscribe as the subject.

other articles

A sunny massacre of innocence: James Meyer's ironic pentameter.

Animal instinct, bee, swarm, self-organisation, political animal and animal politics: complexity and post-structuralism generate a call for adhocracy.

SEEN - world art in the new millenium.

'A tour de force of imaginative suppleness' - Himmelfarb reviewed.

Maureen Cavanaugh: girl on girl.

The artworld's Big, dislocation and five video screens to Nowhere: Meaghan Kent reports from
New York
.

10,000 bananas can't be wrong: Douglas Fishbone wild in the New York jungle.

Andrew Krasnow transforms the skin of white Americans into works that examine the issues of dehumanization, iconography and taboo..

The rise and rise of photography.

Ray Johnson on the subject of death: a slide show of 8 images by the artist renowned for being unknown.

Post 9/11 security generates work of art

William Kentridge restrospective at the New Museum New York reviewed by Eric Gelber.

 

 

letter from new york : : ian summers


the rise and rise of photography

A group of thirty-four students entered the Bruce Silverstein Gallery in Manhattan's expanding Chelsea district led by a red mustachioed teacher who seemed as disinterested as they were. High school or university students. This was a field trip. They were fulfilling an obligation. Most wore baggies, chains, body piercings, and other paraphernalia that has become their costume.

Bruce Silverstein proudly told me that his is the only gallery in Chelsea specializing in vintage photographs. His gallery was surrounded by a seemingly square mile of contemporary photography exhibits. Silverstein's walls were tense with mementos of World War II images by photojournalist and artist Lucien Aigner. This is the first solo exhibition of early Aigner's. The show celebrates Aigner's one hundredth birthday.

"Why would they be showing this shit," said a student. "It's old." I cringed. I realized that if she was in her mid teen years, I could be three times her age. I wondered how this culture differed from my era. My own teen aged costume of defiance consisted of black sandals, dirty feet, a black turtleneck, black Levis, and-I can see out but you can't see in-iridescent black sunglasses. On weekends, when prowling Greenwich Village, I might have been seen wearing a black beret. Black was beautiful.

Beatniks, Hippies, Yippees, Yuppies, Boomers, Generation X'ers, what's the difference? Anyway, what does this have to do with art galleries in Chelsea? Well, elder (21-30) Generation X'ers have money and have become consumers of art. Their interests, needs and desires have effected the New York art world.

The beats were focused on their existential selves as a means of expression which showed up as literature, poetry, coffee houses, eastern religions, etc. Hippies cared about the world. The psychedelic art movement spawned popular artists like Peter Max who would later be asked to become a member of Mayor Rudy Guiliani's Decency Squad.

They were the flower children until they quit and became yuppies which manifested careerists like Koons, Sallé, Schnabel and those who are already forgotten. Koons whom has risen from recent poverty continues to have his work manufactured by assistants. I always wondered whether he could paint. He is the epitome of boy wonder even at the age of 46. Now, Sallé can paint. However his work at the Gagosian last month brought nothing new to the world. Doomed perhaps, to become wallpaper in corporate lobbies. Schnabel should have been a film maker in the first place. His latest movie is a better example of his painting than his paintings.

Aging X-ers seem to have turned the focus back on themselves without giving a damn about making a difference. They are isolated. They socialize on the Internet and rarely create opportunities to look others in the eye. They hide behind Internet handles in chat rooms. They are seen at openings in their alter ego nerd outfits. They speak only to each other, if at all. They avoid labor intensive activities. They made their fortunes before they were 25. They lack humility. They come from Silicon Alley and Madison Avenue which no one refers to as Madison Avenue anymore because the advertising businesses moved downtown to lofts in Soho abandoned by galleries who moved to Chelsea.

X-ers go to galleries to furnish apartments their parents could never afford. They are looking for easy-does-it art. They are looking for accessible art. And aging X-ers are becoming the biggest purchasing power in the Chelsea gallery world.

The gallery world is a service industry. And like all service industries it has to ask itself whom does it serve? Are gallery owners agents for the artists they represent or are they consultants to collectors?

An X-er walked into a rather well known Chelsea gallery and started to browse. Ordinarily viewers are not disturbed by a salesperson of any kind. They look and leave or they look and dawdle, waiting for someone to come out of the back room.

The gallery director asked, "May I help you?"

"I am looking to fill up space on the western wall of my 6,000 square foot loft on Spring Street. It used to belong to an artist before I bought it." said the X-er.

"Of course," thought the gallery owner who knew that too many of New York's artists have already moved to Brooklyn, forced out of their spaces by greedy landlords. The dealer escorted the X-er into his customer salon and offered him a glass of sherry. He asked our X-er about his preferred taste. The X-er did not answer any of the questions. He told the dealer that he only had twenty-five minutes and wanted only to look at art that he could have delivered to his loft for the party on Saturday. He looked around. Eventually he said, "hey, what's that picture over there worth?"

It was a photograph of the Mardi Gras with bare breasted women. "That work is by John Jones and his work sells in the range of $1200 for framed prints. And it is part of a series of eleven photographs taken...." "I'll buy all eleven," said the X-er. As he wrote a check for $11,880 which is $120 less than the smallest painting in the gallery. The details of the sale made its rounds throughout 529 West 20th Street, to the Dia Center, uptown as far as 28th Street. It resulted in a proliferation of accessible easy-does-it photography shows.

No one can doubt the influence of photography on the art world now. About half of the March offerings were photographs. And March was the month for the Armory Show with dealers and galleries worldwide. About half of the Armory Show exhibited photographs. Galleries are following trends rather than creating them.

I wandered into 303 Gallery where there was an exhibit of Tim Gardner's work. From a distance they appeared to be banal self-conscious pretentious snap shots. At closer glance the images were voyeuristic paintings of snap shots using the photograph itself as subject. The individual or group's actions make us aware of the interaction between the subject and the unknown photographer. The paintings are painted from photographs given to him by his brothers, their friends, or his parents. In this new body of work, Gardner continues to push the watercolor medium. Exploring the complexity of his characters is done technically, as if a more accurate facial expression will bring him and us closer to to what is going on inside his subject.

Paintings as paintings can still be seen of course. Robert Dash's Florilegium at ACA Galleries were reminders of his early near abstractions of landscapes. Dash's mark making is facile. He has invented a language of brushstroke and color that redefines floral painting; huge colorful abstractions that only resemble flowers in the second or third look. And then they can be nothing but flowers.

Rico-Maresca was showing photographic collages by graphic designer/illustrator Ivan Chermayoff. While extremely well executed, these images didn't escape a sense of belonging in a magazine, where they would be seen and cherished for a few seconds before the viewer turned the page. Graphic design rarely transforms from print to gallery walls with the exception of the poster. There were far too many images which after a few minutes began repeating themselves relentlessly. It was as if one could visualize the repetitive beat of an old phonograph needle stuck in the groves of a 78 rpm record.

Galleries are meant to be profitable for viewers, collectors, artists, and gallery owners. After all they are businesses. There was a time when intellectuals took their lead from innovative shows. Today galleries seem more concerned with branding and positioning rather than setting trends and taking risks. In what ways will the collapse of dot.coms effect what is being shown in New York galleries?

All is not lost however. Before I close this letter, I want to tell you about the show of shows; the Bombdiggity of installations... [Go to part 2]

Other articles:
[leather to die for]

 

affiliates









artprice