Click here to join our monthly mailing list. Just send a message with 'subscribe' as the subject.

other articles

mail art hits Moscow

e-appraisals of Russian 20th century art

Business opening and art closing in the contemporary Russian art world.

New curatorial approaches bring controversy.

"Dubbing" - artists copying their own work to improve sales - is it moral?

Who controls the Russian art world?

Art & spirituality: after decades of pressure against religions, the pendulum of mass consciousness has swung in the opposite direction.

krasnoyarsk museum biennale

Flowers and sunshine in Siberia? myths of siberia

Success and sales or creativity and money.

Masterpieces on chocolate wrappers and tea packets: is russian culture up for grabs?

what siberian artists think of the life of Western artists.

time in siberia

rancho vs desert - the differences between art worlds in Siberia and the West.

 

letter from siberia : : vladimir gavrikov

creators & sellers


Eugenii Tolmashov "Demon"

Reading "Is success all it's cracked up to be?" by Carol Katchen [1] in International Artist #16, I was stricken by a strange feeling. Katchen questioned how an artist copes with the problems that success brings, how they could weather downturns in sales etc. I found no mention that the artwork must be great.

In fact, creativity and the business side of art present clearly separated facets of the same coin, called artist. For those familiar with Eric Berne's transactional analysis (in vogue some decades ago), from a psychological point of view an artist can be seen as both Creator and Seller. Only God can afford to do nothing but create. Others have it tough. Even if God's spark of creativity glimmers in an artist her or his body still demands food and excitement.

Living among Siberian artists, observing their lifestyles, and getting into their problems I wondered how the Creator and Seller can be united in them. The Creator and Seller are quite different states of psychology. So different, it could be like dealing with two different persons.

Suppose we consider a painter at work. When does the thought that the painting could be exchanged for money come into her or his mind? From the very beginning, or long after the work has been completed?

Victor Rogachev, a Krasnoyarsk artist, expressed his practice in this way: "In principle, I paint for myself. Only this way, can I manage to do a good artwork." This is the pure stand of the Creator - I am creating, everybody, b*** off!

To take another example: an artist asked an art shop to sell his painting. Time goes by, week after week, and the painting stays on the wall - it was not sold (which is a quite frequent occurrence). Whose failure is that - the shop or of the artist? "This is largely my fault," - says Sergej Forostovskii [2] demonstrating a stand of the Seller. A stale item is a responsibility of the Seller. The same artist, Sergej, believes that a true artist has to be intolerant. He has to recognize only his own art, otherwise his personality and his art would be smeared. What is this if not the superiority complex of the Creator?

If on the other hand, a shop sells a painting, then whose success is that? Every artist I asked this question said that this was at half their own achievement. The Seller inside the artist requires a share in the success.

Let's consider possible strategic mottos for artists. An artist can:
A. paint only what they believe to be right, "true art", independent of whether it sells or not;
B. paint mostly "true art" and sometimes what sells;
C. paint mostly what sells and when there is an opportunity what is "true", and
D. paint only what sells.

It might be said that extremes are rare, that most people are e.g. neither fish nor flesh type, but a mixture. And you will be right, but artists give charismatic examples of maximalism (strategy A). Herman Kiselev, a Krasnoyarsk based artist, is among those who say that strategy A is the only worthy one. "People want to see the personality of the artist, his point of view, they feel when it's painted freely, with no desire to please", - he says. Fortunately for him, his canvases are rather popular though quite expensive.

Herman Kiselev "Karmen" oil on canvas

Eugenii Tolmashov presents a less fortunate case. He is a painter who did not receive regular education and paints "how God put it on the soul", (as it's expressed by us Russians). In spite of that, he is recognized by educated, academic artists, which is quite rare. They agree that what he does is "true art". I happen to know how he lives - with no permanent place to reside, no job, no family, but with great ambition to create.

Eugenii Tolmashov "Demon" oil on canvas

As far as I am aware, his paintings do not sell, perhaps because they are emotionally so strong that people just do not risk keeping them at home.

Alexander Levchenko "But it's spring outside" oil on canvas

Alexander Levchenko is another example of sincere maximalist, strategy A artist. Paintings by Levchenko on Russian themes depict mostly whimsical characters from villages and small towns. That the paintings are done from the bottom of the artist's heart there is no doubt, and they are philosophically profound in catching reality, but they may upset or even hurt the national pride of Russians. As a Russian, I would not hang most of his paintings at home despite their many artistic virtues. The artworks are too disturbing.

Opposite to strategy A maximalists, the other pole is represented by inveterate Sellers. There is an observation as to what subjects the broad public wants to have. It's incredible but the masses here buy mostly images of their area of residence, so to say, of what they see every day from the window. The public asks one further thing of the art: that the paintings should not be expensive. Therefore, there are artists here that simply satisfy these demands.

Victor Markovskih developed a trade style of affordable landscapes that sell quite well. I have no intention to say that he does no "creative" artwork but, at least, no attempts have been made that would evolve his approach.

Victor Markovskih "Recollection" oil on canvas

Small oils on cardboard by Ludmila Domenchak depict fragments of motherland nature. They are sold at low prices as nice inexpensive presents.

Ludmila Domenchak "Winter" oil on cardboard

Psychological rooting inside themselves has always been a distinctive feature of Russian intellectuals. Why do people paint something that does not sell? Through an analysis of the Creator & Seller model, we can perhaps understand artists much better. However I have found no final answer to this question. An approach to the answer might be understanding the phenomenon of talent. In a sense, talent is a pain that lives inside an artist giving them no peace until it finds a way out in the form of a painting (or verses, books, etc.).

Vladimir Gavrikov
gavrikov@online.ru

Sources
[1] Carol Katchen "Is success all it's cracked up to be?", International Artist #16, December/January 2001
[2] An article by Sergej is available in International Artist Magazine #17

Back to top

affiliates

Website Creations Web Hosting & Domain Registration
We recommend their service based on our experience of their service. We reviewed web services world wide before deciding on them, based on services and good price.

Need Online Help Desk Software?
Website Creations developed their own, which has an automated follow up and alert system. Handy.


Search the World's Largest Visual Art Events Database








artprice