<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments on SCANZ Exhibition</title>
    <link>http://intercreate.org/view/scanz-exhibition</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:46:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>The Govett-Brewster and Puke Ariki are pleased to present a new media exhibition in conjunction with Solar Circuit Aotearoa New Zealand (SCANZ). Co-curated by Mercedes Vicente, Sarah Cook, and Intercreate.org.
</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;hi Sarah, I was interested in something you mentioned at the closing talk panel session at the symposium. when you mentioned that you wouldn&amp;#8217;t class the G-B &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SCANZ&lt;/span&gt; exhibition as a new media exhibition. is this correct &amp;#8211; sorry if I misheard what you said. if so, what, in your experience would it need to be a new media exhibition? ie what have other new media exhibitions had that &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SCANZ&lt;/span&gt; didn&amp;#8217;t?&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;and I was also wondering what the artists chosen thought &amp;#8211; do they think of their work as new media or is it just another label to them?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://intercreate.org/view/scanz-exhibition#content_32008</link>
      <guid>http://intercreate.org/view/scanz-exhibition#content_32008</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:46:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>kath odonnell</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
